Archive for June, 2008


This is our newest video, as you can see Obama has been missing in action many times.  He claims he wants to help Native American Issues, however doesn’t bother to show up for key issues…

Words are just that words.. Nothing more, Senator Obama your actions speak very loudly…….

I would like to begin by saying there are many “groups” on the web today.  I am not sure how many, probably thousands, or more.  When I first joined some, I honestly didn’t think twice about joining.  It seemed a a good way to connect with like minded people.  I like most of us, picked groups that I had something in common with.  For the first few months, most of my posting went well.  But somewhere, things began to blur together.  Like a old black and white movie, shown way to many times….

It seems though, there are lots of really hateful things that go on inside these web groups.  For the most part I have found that about 50% of the groups, are really a cover for something else.  The members each have their own agenda, and hope to get all the sheep to follow.   The problems seem to surface, when and if you make a stand against the members.  It is not acceptable, in alot of theses groups, to disagree.   If and when you do, the attacks begin….

I discovered this the hard, way.  I belong to several political groups.  All, or so I thought Anti-Obama groups.   Through the long months of the primary, I was there, posting and replying and going along quite nicely.  But, there came a time when educating others was not all that important to the group anymore.  Which to be perfectly honest, surprised me.

I began to see members posting and trying to come up with new and fresh ideas, struck down and stomped on like a small chicken.   Many members of the group, became very possive of it.  Controlling every message posted, and even editing what was posted.  I did notice that sometimes things I posted never saw the light of day.  Posted were edited, and even just rejected.   The main reason, they just didn’t like them, or didn’t want to take the time to approve them…

I am not talking about posts that were vulgar, or nasty in any way.  They were information, voter information to educate people.  This is what I mean by the some groups are a cover up for something else.  You see, this group had its own website and store.  They sold items, anti Obama items and still do.  So, if anyone wanted to post a new idea on anything that would take sales away from the store, then that was not allowed…

So, I have to ask, just what is the group really about?  Is it about telling the truth and educate voters?  Or is the agenda of the group, to sell more T’shirts and Bumper Stickers than anyone else…..

You see, a member posted that they were going to try to raise money for a TV Commerical, and he was stomped on for days!  Over and over the mean and hateful remarks flew, and finally I made a statement, “This is not A Compatition!”. That was not a good thing to say, because to these group members it is!  You see, no matter how good the idea or cause, it didn’t matter.  Because, if you helped him, you were a traitor.  All your money and energy should go only to the group owner, who also owned the website….

There is no working together, there is no comprimise.  It is all controled, beware of these groups.  The will attempt to suck the life blood from you.  They are hostile toward anyone, who does not donate money to them and them only!  To these groups it is the ultamine betrayal to give to anyone but them!

Our Native American group is not like that, we do not ask for money and will not accept it.  It is our goal to educate all Native Americans, and anyone else who is willing to listen.   We only want what is best for all the nations, that is all, nothing more. We do not sell anything… Please feel free to join us, its free! 

 

video

I have been asked many times, Why? The reasons are many, most importantly, trust. Why should any American trust Obama? All Americans, not just Native Americans need to ask themselves, Why?

Why should anyone simply trust someone with the most important job in this country, with such as flimsy resume. Just a little reading, will educate all of us. We must all ask ourselves, what good will this do our community?

To me the answer is clear, sometimes change is not good.

I have also been asked, what would McCain do for Native Americans, to this I say:

McCain sat on the Senate Committee for Indian affairs, he is a veteran, and we have many. Our needs as Native Americans are not that different from others. Heath Care, Education and Poverty are the most basic needs.

John McCain, would help our veterans, and also stand with us, not above or in front of us. He has made several stands that lead me to believe that he would help us, as a people.

What do we know about Obama? We know he changes his mind, when it is nessary (palatially). So the question we all have to ask is will he stand with us, or say “These are not the people I knew”.

This is about trust, and I have no trust in Obama…… Join us……

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/native_americans_against_obama/

The Tax Plan Give Away.. Presented by Obama…..

Republicans allowed a bill that carries his name, among nine others, to pass the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by voice vote last week – without any hearings. That means there was no roll-call vote so no member can be held accountable. The same bill passed the House by voice vote last year.

The Obama bill passed out of committee with the cooperation of the co-sponsor, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind. A Rhodes scholar like former President Bill Clinton, Lugar has never seen a United Nations enhancement he didn’t like.

Obama’s costly, dangerous and altogether bad bill (S. 2433), which could come up in the Senate any day, is called the Global Poverty Act. It would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7 percent of our Gross Domestic Product on foreign handouts, which is at least $30 billion over and above the exorbitant and wasted sums we already give away overseas.

The bipartisan bill would require the president “to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.”

The bill’s other co-sponsors include Sens. Joseph Biden, D-Del., Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., Chris Dodd, D-Conn., Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Russ Feingold, D-Wis., Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., Charles Hagel, R-Neb., and Robert Mendez, D-N.J.

We should be on guard any time politicians use the word “comprehensive,” an umbrella word that always shades a lot of mischief. The notion that U.S. taxpayers should or could cut in half the number of people worldwide who live in poverty by 2015 is ridiculous.

The Millennium project is monitored by Jeffrey D. Sachs, a Columbia University economist. In 2005, he presented then-U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan with a 3,000-page report based on the research of 265 so-called poverty specialists.

Sachs’ document criticized the United States for giving only $16.3 billion a year in global anti-poverty aid. He argued that we should spend an additional $30 billion a year to reach the 0.7 percent target the U.N. set for the United Sates in 2000.

Sachs says that the only way to force the United States to commit that much money is by a global tax, such as a tax on fossil fuels. Empowering the United Nations to impose a direct international tax on Americans has been a U.N. goal ever since the 1995 Copenhagen Summit embraced the so-called Tobin Tax.

By adopting the Millennium Goals in 2000, the U.N. escalated its demands to impose international taxes. Specifically, the Millennium called for a “currency transfer tax,” a “tax on the rental value of land and natural resources,” a “royalty on worldwide fossil energy projection – oil, natural gas, coal,” “fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on the carbon content of fuels.”
It doesn’t bother U.N. sycophants that most U.S. handouts go into the hands of corrupt dictators who hate us and vote against us in the U.N., and that only 30 percent of American foreign aid ever reaches the poor. U.N. bureaucrats accuse the United States of being “stingy” in its handouts to underdeveloped countries.

There is much more to the Millennium Goals than merely extorting more money from U.S. taxpayers. The goals set forth a comprehensive plan to put the United States under U.N. global governance.

These goals include a “standing peace force” (i.e., a U.N. standing army), a “U.N. Arms Register” of all small arms and light weapons, “peace education” covering “all levels from preschool through university,” and “political control of the global economy.” The goals call for implementing all U.N. treaties that the United States has never ratified, all of which set up U.N. monitoring committees to compromise U.S. sovereignty.

To achieve this level of control over U.S. domestic law, the plan calls for “strengthening the United Nations for the 21st century” by “eliminating” the veto and permanent membership in the Security Council. The goal is to reduce U.S. influence to one out of 192 nations, so we would have merely the same vote as Cuba.

The Global Poverty Act would be a giant step toward the Millennium Goals of global governance and international taxes on Americans

NATIVE AMERICANS AGAINST OBAMA
FOR GOOD REASON’S

Obama failed to address “Real” Native American issues during the Democrat Primaries.

Obama over all, did not win the Native American Vote in the primaries across the country.

NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CARE: A NATIONAL SICK JOKE!
Obama says he will bring about universal health care for all Americans. Obama made no commitment to Native Americans that he would increase federal funding of their health care facilities and programs to bring them in line with national health care standards. The political realistic chance Obama could bring about universal health care in a four year term is unrealistic. Obama’s national health plan would leave Native Americans where they are now, at the bottom of the list for federal health care funding.

NATIVE AMERICAN EDUCTION SYSTEM: A NATIONAL SICK JOKE!
Obama made no commitment for federal funds to repair or build new Indian schools. Across the country many Indian schools are in shambles for lack of federal funding to maintain them. Some Indian schools are being forced to close because they cannot run them a full school term on the small amount of allocated federal funding allotted.

NATIVE AMERICAN POVERTY RATE: A NATIONAL SICK JOKE!
Obama made no economic commitment to Native Americans that he would bring about a national Indian business empowerment program dedicated to ending the high rate of unemployment, poverty and total lack of financial institutions willing to support Native American Communities on reservations in developing a self sustaining business infrastructure. Obama is aware Native Americans today are being economically starved off their reservation lands while the federal government supports foreign countries with billions of our tax dollars each year to support their economic well being, Obama will not change that status-quo.

OBAMA HAS NO PLAN FOR “CHANGE” FOR NATIVE AMERICNAS
Obama has not showed Native Americans he has the leadership capabilities nor personal willingness to fully address and implement a policy of change that would help Native Americans if he was elected president. The more Obama talks about “Change” Native Americans see no “Change Nor Commitment” for them with Obama as president.

A VOTE FOR OBAMA IS A VOTE FOR NO REAL CHANGE!!

Obama missing in action on real Native American issues:

S.1779 Senate BillTitle: A bill to establish a program for tribal colleges and universities within the Department of Health and Human Services and to amend the Native American Programs Act of 1974 to authorize the provision of grants and cooperative agreements to tribal colleges and universities, and for other purposes.

S.1859 Title: An original bill making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes.

S.2363 Senate BillTitle: A bill making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes.

S.310 Senate BillTitle: A bill to express the policy of the United States regarding the United States relationship with Native Hawaiians and to provide a process for the recognition by the United States of the Native Hawaiian governing entity.
S.2176 Senate BillTitle: A bill to promote the development of Native American small business concerns, and for other purposes.

S.2062 Senate BillTitle: A bill to amend the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 to reauthorize that Act, and for other purposes.
S.RES.400 Senate Bill Title: A resolution to designate Friday, November 23, 2007, as “Native American Heritage Day” in honor of the achievements and contributions of Native Americans to the United States.

This list Covering Obama Goes On & On
Obama For “What Change” Should Be The Question.!

PLEASE COPY THIS AND EMAIL IT TO ALL, WHO ARE WILLING TO LISTEN!!!

Republicans allowed a bill that carries his name, among nine others, to pass the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by voice vote last week – without any hearings. That means there was no roll-call vote so no member can be held accountable. The same bill passed the House by voice vote last year.

The Obama bill passed out of committee with the cooperation of the co-sponsor, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind. A Rhodes scholar like former President Bill Clinton, Lugar has never seen a United Nations enhancement he didn’t like.

Obama’s costly, dangerous and altogether bad bill (S. 2433), which could come up in the Senate any day, is called the Global Poverty Act. It would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7 percent of our Gross Domestic Product on foreign handouts, which is at least $30 billion over and above the exorbitant and wasted sums we already give away overseas.

The bipartisan bill would require the president “to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.”

The bill’s other co-sponsors include Sens. Joseph Biden, D-Del., Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., Chris Dodd, D-Conn., Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Russ Feingold, D-Wis., Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., Charles Hagel, R-Neb., and Robert Mendez, D-N.J.

We should be on guard any time politicians use the word “comprehensive,” an umbrella word that always shades a lot of mischief. The notion that U.S. taxpayers should or could cut in half the number of people worldwide who live in poverty by 2015 is ridiculous.

The Millennium project is monitored by Jeffrey D. Sachs, a Columbia University economist. In 2005, he presented then-U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan with a 3,000-page report based on the research of 265 so-called poverty specialists.

Sachs’ document criticized the United States for giving only $16.3 billion a year in global anti-poverty aid. He argued that we should spend an additional $30 billion a year to reach the 0.7 percent target the U.N. set for the United Sates in 2000.

Sachs says that the only way to force the United States to commit that much money is by a global tax, such as a tax on fossil fuels. Empowering the United Nations to impose a direct international tax on Americans has been a U.N. goal ever since the 1995 Copenhagen Summit embraced the so-called Tobin Tax.

By adopting the Millennium Goals in 2000, the U.N. escalated its demands to impose international taxes. Specifically, the Millennium called for a “currency transfer tax,” a “tax on the rental value of land and natural resources,” a “royalty on worldwide fossil energy projection – oil, natural gas, coal,” “fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on the carbon content of fuels.”
It doesn’t bother U.N. sycophants that most U.S. handouts go into the hands of corrupt dictators who hate us and vote against us in the U.N., and that only 30 percent of American foreign aid ever reaches the poor. U.N. bureaucrats accuse the United States of being “stingy” in its handouts to underdeveloped countries.

There is much more to the Millennium Goals than merely extorting more money from U.S. taxpayers. The goals set forth a comprehensive plan to put the United States under U.N. global governance.

These goals include a “standing peace force” (i.e., a U.N. standing army), a “U.N. Arms Register” of all small arms and light weapons, “peace education” covering “all levels from preschool through university,” and “political control of the global economy.” The goals call for implementing all U.N. treaties that the United States has never ratified, all of which set up U.N. monitoring committees to compromise U.S. sovereignty.

To achieve this level of control over U.S. domestic law, the plan calls for “strengthening the United Nations for the 21st century” by “eliminating” the veto and permanent membership in the Security Council. The goal is to reduce U.S. influence to one out of 192 nations, so we would have merely the same vote as Cuba.

The Global Poverty Act would be a giant step toward the Millennium Goals of global governance and international taxes on Americans.

I have been asked many times, Why? The reasons are many, most importantly, trust. Why should any American trust Obama? All Americans, not just Native Americans need to ask themselves, Why?

Why should anyone simply trust someone with the most important job in this country, with such as flimsy resume. Just a little reading, will educate all of us. We must all ask ourselves, what good will this do our community?

To me the answer is clear, sometimes change is not good.

I have also been asked, what would McCain do for Native Americans, to this I say:

McCain sat on the Senate Committee for Indian affairs, he is a veteran, and we have many. Our needs as Native Americans are not that different from others. Heath Care, Education and Poverty are the most basic needs.

John McCain, would help our veterans, and also stand with us, not above or in front of us. He has made several stands that lead me to believe that he would help us, as a people.

What do we know about Obama? We know he changes his mind, when it is nessary (palatially). So the question we all have to ask is will he stand with us, or say “These are not the people I knew”.

This is about trust, and I have no trust in Obama…… Join us……

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/native_americans_against_obama/

"What I Meant to Say"……

It seems that Obama and Michelle are saying this phrase more and more each day. Yesterday on the view, Michelle had to try to clarify her Anti-American remarks. She did state of course, what she said, was not what she meant. This has become a popular scapegoat throughout this campaign. It appears that alot of Americans are not able to understand what they really mean. This makes all of us wonder what really is the truth. This scapegoat excuse goes way back to super Tuesday. Where Obama had a conversation with Canada about NAFTA, and the stories did not match. Why? Because we didn’t understand him correctly?

I find all the excuses, just that excuses. On the view, Michelle spoke about the statement she made that her husband was “sweet and pathetic”. But of course, we all miss understood that to. What she meant to say was “sweet and sympathetic“. And of course there is the “whitey” statement, where she meant “why’d he”. So now it clear, according to the Obama’s alot of people in America can’t understand English.

ABC news is reporting that Obama had a conversation with the Iraqi foreign minister. But, of course there is a communication problem. Obama remembers the conversation in a very different way than the foreign minister.

Senator Obama remembers they conversation as follows:

“I think that he expressed what President Maliki has expressed as well,” Obama continued, “which is that the Iraqis are obviously concerned about their sovereignty and are not seeking a long term occupation by the U.S. And so my sense is that we should be able to execute a withdrawal and set a timeframe – a timetable that continues to allow US forces to support Iraqi forces in going after terrorists, that continues to train the Iraqi police and military as long as we’re not training militias that are turning on each other. One area that I think is important to emphasize is that as a consequence of a huge spike in oil prices – the Iraqi government’s budget is twice as large as it anticipated and so I think its important for the Iraqis to start picking up more of the tab both for reconstruction efforts as well as the need to continue to boost their military capacity.”

Ok, so he said, they talked about a timetable. But here is the problem The Iraqi official remembers the conversation differently:

Mr. Zebari said he told Mr. Obama that “Iraq is not an island.” In other words, an American withdrawal that destabilized the country would also roil the region around it and embolden U.S. adversaries such as alQaeda and Iran. “We have a deadly enemy,” Mr. Zebari said. “When he sees that you commit yourself to a certain timetable, he will use this to increase pressure and attacks, to make it look as though he is forcing you out. We have many actors who would love to take advantage of that opportunity.”

The foreign minister said “my message” to Mr. Obama “was very clear. . . . Really, we are making progress. I hope any actions you will take will not endanger this progress.” He said he was reassured by the candidate’s response, which caused him to think that Mr. Obama might not differ all that much from Mr. McCain. Mr. Zebari said that in addition to promising a visit, Mr. Obama said that “if there would be a Democratic administration, it will not take any irresponsible, reckless, sudden decisions or action to endanger your gains, your achievements, your stability or security.

So, what he meant to say was? We are withdrawing from Iraq? They agreed? Am I missing something here? Ok……

Now it gets better….. This is the Iraqi ministers view on the difference between Obama and McCain….

He said he was reassured by the candidate’s response, which caused him to think that Mr. Obama might not differ all that much from Mr. McCain.

I thought the war was the “most important difference” between the two candidates. It appears we have another “what I meant to say moment”.

The problem is with so many of these “moments” how can we know what the truth is? The answer is clear, we cannot. It seems that Obama is no different than most politicians, he says what we want to hear at the time. This appears to be the reasoning behind all the “what I meant to say”. This then pleases the person with whom he is speaking to.

Kind of sounds like a appeasement arguement to me. When speaking to the Jewish Voting community, he assured them he would stand beside Israel. However, his past AntiSemitic connections also haunt him. Another contrast, and there are many such examples.

Obama is a walking contradiction, knowing this, I have to ask how can we really trust someone like that, with our country?

According to the AOL polls, there is a problem. As, you can see she is not seen very favourably.

Poll Results
What is your general opinion of Michelle Obama?
Unfavorable
59%
135,326
Favorable
32%
73,087
I don’t have an opinion
9%
20,917
Note on Poll Results Total Votes: 229,330


Poll Results
Does your opinion of a candidate’s spouse influence your vote?
Yes
62%
132,345
No
37%
80,291
I don’t vote
1%
2,524
Note on Poll Results Total Votes: 215,160

This is the transcript from the Larry Sinclair Press Statement today:

Larry Sinclair held a news conference at the National Press Club today, Wednesday, June 18, 2008. Sinclair divulged the limo drivers name, Paramjit Multani. Multani was driving the Five Star Limousine that Sinclair rented. Sinclair also provided a document that reveals that a Rashpal Multani was an agent for the corporation operating the limo service in 1999. Reverend Manning, I am told, was in attendance.

Here is the Larry Sinclair news conference press release:

PRESS STATEMENT OF LARRY SINCLAIR

JUNE 18, 2008

Good afternoon, my name is Larry Sinclair and I am a former recreational drug user and trafficker, a convicted felon for crimes of forgery, bad checks and theft by check. I am also an American who loves this country and I cannot stay silent regarding Barack Obama knowing what I know.

Today I will discharge my obligation as a citizen to witness this knowledge to you and raise questions for others to investigate and consider. I am going to briefly describe my background, my experience with Senator Obama in 1999, what appears to me to be a coordinated effort to discredit me and finally a list of questions. After this brief statement, I will take and try to answer any reasonable questions.

Background

I am 46 years old and I currently reside in Duluth, MN. I am a US Citizen, and I have made mistakes in my lifetime. I have been convicted and served prison sentences for writing bad checks, forging checks, using stolen credit card numbers in Arizona, Florida and Colorado. These event’s occurred over twenty (20) years ago between 1980 thru 1986. After going public on the internet with these claims against Senator Obama earlier this year, I became aware of a warrant out of Florida from 1986 which I have resolved and it has now been dismissed. I also have an active “Colorado Only” warrant for alleged “Theft and Forgery”. I am not ignoring this warrant but am addressing it with the Court in Colorado as well as with the DA’s office. I have a pending motion to dismiss this warrant which I am waiting to have calendared by the Colorado Court.
I have lived and worked under three different names. My birth name is Lawrence W. Sinclair. Later on, I had my name legally changed first to La-Rye A. Silvas, and then La-Rye Vizcarra Avila. The last two were legal name changes granted by the court in Penal County Superior Court, Florence Arizona. I legally returned to my birth name in the Fremont County District court, Canon City, Colorado in 1997.

Obama Incident

I flew out of Colorado Springs, Colorado to Chicago on November 2, 1999, arriving in O’Hare early in the morning of November 3, 1999. I went to the Chicago area to attend the graduation of my god son (my best friend’s son) from basic training from the Great Lakes Navy Training Center. I made reservations at the Comfort Inn and Suites in Gurnee, IL based on location to the Navy Training center. On November 5, 1999, I hired the services of Five Star Limo. I had hired them for both November 5 and November 6. On November 6, 1999, I asked the limo driver – whose name I now reveal for the first time – Paramjit Multani, if he knew anyone who would like to socialize and show me Chicago. Paramjit Multani understood that I was not looking for someone who knew Chicago and would enjoy socializing. Paramjit Multani said he knew someone who was a friend of his.

On November 6, 1999 after picking me up at the Hotel in Gurnee– and this is significant – Paramjit Multani used his cellphone to make a call. That call was made to then-Illinois State Senator Barack Obama to set up an introduction between me and Senator Obama. Upon arriving at the bar and exiting the Limo, Senator Obama was standing next to Paramjit Multani and I was introduced to Senator Obama. Later that evening at a bar which I believe was called Alibis, I mention I could use a line or two to wake up. Senator Obama asked me if I was referring to “coke” and after stating I was, Obama stated he could purchase cocaine for me and then made a telephone call – and this too is significant — from his cellphone to a presently unknown individual during which Senator Obama arranged the cocaine purchase.

Senator Obama and I then departed the bar in my limousine and proceeded to an unknown location where Senator Obama exited the limousine with two hundred fifty dollars ($250) I had given him and returned a short while later with an “eightball” of cocaine which he gave to me. I did ingest a couple of lines of cocaine, and shortly thereafter Senator Obama produced a glass cylinder pipe and packet of crack cocaine from his pants pocket and Obama smoked the crack cocaine. I performed fellatio on Senator Obama in the limousine during the time Senator Obama was smoking crack cocaine, after which I had the driver take me to the my hotel, The Comfort Suits, Gurnee, Illinois.

The following day, November 7, 1999, Senator Obama appeared at my hotel room where we again ingested cocaine and I again performed fellatio on Senator Obama. Significantly, both the driver’s telephone call to Senator Obama and his call to the drug dealer should appear on the driver’s and Senator Obama’s cellphone billing statements.

Fall 2007

In September 2007 I contacted the Presidential Campaign of Barack H. Obama, to request solely that Senator Obama publicly correct his stated drug use record to reflect his use of crack cocaine with me in November 1999. When I made that first contact I left with the Presidential Campaign of Senator Barack H. Obama a telephone number for the campaign to return my call. The first number I provided was a Texas cell phone number. From the period of Labor day weekend 2007 through November 18, 2007 I did rovide a total of four (4) different call back numbers to the Obama campaign, as I had moved and had changed the numbers to reflect locally my place of residence at the time. In late September to early October 2007, I received a call from a male who identified himself as a “Mr. Young” stating he was calling in regards to calls I had made to the Obama campaign. This first call was in fact an attempt by “Mr. Young” to obtained from me the identities of anyone I had contacted concerning my 1999 allegations against Senator Obama. This first called shocked me in that this “Mr. Young” asked me why I had not asked Senator Obama to disclose the sexual encounters I had with Mr. Obama in 1999. I was shocked as I had never mentioned to the campaign or anyone working for the campaign any sexual encounters as my call was prompted by drug allegations only. The call ended with “Mr. Young” stating I would hear from someone in a few days.

In mid to late October 2007, I received a second call from this “Mr. Young” at which time I clearly became aware that this individual was personally involved with Senator Obama rather than just an employee of his campaign. The tone of the conversation had a sexual nature. “Mr. Young” did not once advise me how he obtained my phone number which by this time had now changed to a Delaware number.

In late October 2007, I received a text message from the gentleman identified as “Mr. Young” in which he stated he was intimately involved with Senator Obama and that Obama was discussing with him and his pastor how to publicly acknowledge Senator Obama’s drug use in 1999 and that Obama wanted to be sure I had not discussed the sexual encounters or drug incidents with any media at that time.

In mid to late November 2007, in another text message from “Mr. Young” , he advised me that Senator Obama will publicly correct his statement as to he last time he used drugs and I did not need to concern myself with publicly disclosing it myself. The last contact I had with “Mr. Young” was in early December 2007 when he made it clear to me that Senator Obama had no intentions of publicly acknowledging his 1999 use of crack cocaine and that “Mr. Young” was in fact doing nothing more than milking information from me for Senator Obama’s use.

I later learned that a Donald Young was the choir director of Reverend Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ – Obama’s now-former church — and was openly a homosexual. I also learned that he was murdered on December 23, 2007. I have cooperated with the Chicago Police Department in this matter by providing them the telephone numbers I was using during the fall of 2007 and I release them now publically in the hope that someone may be able to connect the dots between these telephone numbers and Mr. Young. Those numbers are: 954-758-1105; 956-758-1885; 956-758-8002; 302-685-7175; 612-466-1043.

2008

In what I now realize was a naive and un-counseled decision, I posted in January 2008 a video on YouTube.com where I related the above information regarding my liaisons with Senator Obama in 1999. The response was overwhelming and I quickly became the recipient of what in hindsight appears to have been a coordinated attack on my character with ever increasing falsehoods circulating on the internet.

In response I agreed to take a polygraph test from Whitehouse.com. The results of that test have been partially revealed to the end of labeling me a liar and taken as gospel by all. I would like to make the following comments about that polygraph test. First, I have been subsequently advised that Whitehouse.com was a website dedicated to anti-Clinton pornography until earlier this year. Second, I have now come to understand that lie detectors are junk science at best which is why courts of law refuse to use them. Third, a review of the results by George W. Maschke, Ph.D. of AntiPolygraph.org raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the examination. Indeed, overlooked by almost everyone is that hitehouse.com’s own examiner, Dr. Gordon Barland, observed that on the drug question regarding Senator Obama that the computerized score found that there was less than a 1% probability of deception by me. That’s about as high a passing score as one can possibly attain.

Finally, in February 2008 I was told anonymously that Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com received $750,000 from the Obama campaign through AKR Media to organize an effort to publically discredit me. When I confronted Dan Parisi with this allegation, he did not deny it but instead withdrew the second exonerating polygraph report of Dr. Gordon Barland, failed to post the video of my polygraph as he and Whitehouse.com promised they would do, and even removed posts from their web site altogether, claiming that they had “had enough of the attacks by Sinclair’s supporters and Sinclair himself.”

The polygraph results – as misrepresented – were immediately seized upon by the blogger community and I became the subject of vicious lies about me. I was forced to file a lawsuit in an attempt to stop those lies about me that have been circulating. That lawsuit sought to obtain the proof of what I was saying about my contact with Senator Obama through subpoenas for the identities of the anonymous bloggers so they could be linked to the Obama campaign and relevant records of the cellphone companies to prove the truth of my allegations. To date, though the lawsuit is now over ninety days old, Judge Kennedy has refused to permit the suit to move forward so this evidence may be obtained.

Conclusion

In sum, you can discredit my story and then make your decision on who should be the next President of the United States. The burden is now off me as I have told my story without the distortions that have been intentionally heaped on me in what my lawyer tells me is an ad hominem attack – shoot the messenger so you don’t have to hear the message he is bringing. I am now done. It is for others to find the corroborating evidence of my story by locating the limousine driver – Paramjit Multani – and the telephone numbers related to Donald Young and/or Senator Obama. I leave you with these questions that I have asked of Senator Obama but which he – who wants to be the next President of the United States – has refused to answer:

1. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone records for all his personal and official cell phones held by him for the time period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999, when we met?

2. Why won’t Senator Obama provide his cellphone numbers and telephone records for all his personal and official cell phones held by Senator Obama or September 2007 – December 23, 2008, the murder of Donald Young?

3. Why won’t Senator Obama provide all email communication both personal and campaign related to and/or from AKP Message & Media from January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod and David Plouffe?

4. Why won’t Senator Obama provide proof of all payments made from AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008?

On my website – larrysinclair.org – you will find the documents that I have referred to in this statement. A copy of the home page for that website is attached. Thank you for your time and attention this afternoon and I will now take any questions.

– E n d –

http://larrysinclair.org

Chapter 2

Elections are won by broken promises, mindset of hope – that at least a little something will be changed in future to the better. People live for today and vote for tomorrow. During the pre-election campaign voters received just a sample of better things to come – universal heath care, an end to the war. However, if the elections promises stay true to history, voters will still be walking along damaged roads and darkened streets. Below are just a few examples from history.



1916- The Promise-Presidential Election He kept us out of war – Woodrow Wilson

Meant that United States had not been pulled in to World War I (yet) under Wilson.




The truth, we entered the war in 1917.



1928- Presidential Election- The Promise- A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage – Herbert Hoover



Claims that the everyone will be prosperous under a Hoover presidency.

The truth- is much darker, as the great depression started in 1929, under his administering.



1968- Presidential Election Richard Nixon promised to end the war in Vietnam.



The Truth-We all know that after that was the tet offensive and many other battles. This was clearly a statement to win.



Pelosi vowed that five-day workweeks would be a hallmark of a harder-working Democratic majority. So far, the House has logged only one. Lawmakers plan to clock three days this week.

The speaker has denied Republicans a vote on their proposals during congressional debates — a tactic she previously declared oppressive and promised to end. Pelosi has opened the floor to a Republican alternative just once.

2005: In Jackson Square, Bush Promised To The Meet The “Immediate Needs” Of Evacuees. In Jackson Square, Bush said, “Our first commitment is to meet the immediate needs of those who had to flee their homes and leave all their possessions behind.” He specifically referenced “broader assistance in the future.” He also pledged help with housing needs, saying that we’ll provide mobile homes, and supply them with basic services, as close to construction areas as possible, so the rebuilding process can go forward as quickly as possible.” Bush also said his goal was to “get people out of shelters by the middle of October.” [http://www.whitehouse.gov,%20accessed%208/10/06]

70 Percent Of Evacuees Say Most Have Not Received the Help They Need; 84 Percent of African-American Evacuees Say So. According to a Washington Post survey, 70 percent of Katrina evacuees surveyed said most individuals still have not gotten the help they need with housing, health care and restoring their lives. Among African Americans, a group that suffered disproportionately from the storm’s devastation, such sentiment ran stronger. Eighty-four percent of black respondents said most people affected by Katrina had not gotten the help they need to move on with their lives. [Washington Post, 8/20/06]

DEMOCRATIC PROMISE #77: Promptly Name Members to the Ethics PoolPromise: “At the beginning of a Congress, the Speaker or his designee and the Minority Leader or his designee each shall name 10 Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner from his respective party who are not members of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to be available to serve on investigative subcommittees of that committee during that Congress.” – Democrats’ House Rules Package, Clause 5 of rule 10

Broken Promise: “Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has yet to name for this Congress the Democrats’ 10 member ‘ethics pool’ – the group of Members preselected by their respective party leaders to serve on investigative subcommittees as they are needed.” – “No Sign of Life in Jefferson Ethics Probe,” Roll Call, May 24, 2007

DEMOCRATIC PROMISE #33: Protect U.S. Ports Promise: “Immediately implement the recommendations of the independent, bipartisan 9/11 Commission including securing national borders, ports airports and mass transit systems.” – Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) “A New Direction for America,” Page 5

Broken Promise: According to the 9/11 Commission, “The small terrorist travel intelligence collection and analysis program currently in place [the anti-terror ATS-P terrorist screening program] has produced disproportionately useful results. It should be expanded.” But during consideration of the Homeland Security authorization bill in May, 160 House Democrats voted against a Republican proposal to give the Homeland Security Department the authority to continue utilizing the anti-terror ATS-P terrorist screening program. – Roll Call Vote #317, May 9, 2007

DEMOCRATIC PROMISE #43: Protect U.S. Borders Promise: “I believe there is virtually unanimous agreement in the Congress that we must secure our borders and know who is entering our country.” – Then-House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, Press Release, May 25, 2006

Promise: “Democrats are for the rule of law, we want to get border security right. . .We would do what’s necessary to protect our borders …” – Then-House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, Press Release, December 15, 2005

Broken Promise: Just six months after Democrats took power in the House, 214 House Democrats voted against a Republican proposal to “provide the funds necessary for the construction of at least two layers of reinforced fencing, the installation of additional physical barrier, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors pursuant to section 102(b)(1) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1986…”

Bush’s Broken Promises



“He promised to ‘usher in an era of responsibility,’ but instead has presided over an era of fiscal and corporate irresponsibility.

“He promised everyone ‘an equal claim on this country’s promise,’ but instead has waged the most sustained assault on progressive taxation ever.

“He promised to ‘change the tone in Washington,’ but instead has taken partisanship to new heights.

“He promised ‘to confront problems, not pass them on to others,’ but instead has passed a greater financial burden onto future generations than has any administration in history.

“He promised a new Republican Party based on ‘compassionate conservatism,’ but instead has spurred his party to historic depths of corporate cronyism.

“He promised ‘to leave this nation greater than we found it,’ but instead is well on his way to placing America in greater peril, with more sworn enemies and fewer friends, than any time since the darkest moments of the Cold War.

“He promised to ‘uphold the honor and dignity or the office to which I have been elected,’ but instead time after time has been willing to say one thing and do another.”

So, historically this shows that for the most part promised are not kept. The promises of politicians seems to be a ploy to get votes. What every voter should examine is what this person has done in the past. By comparing past votes for or against issues, is much more telling. This will give us all, a much clearer picture of what to expect. In other words, actions speaks louder than words.



As a voter it is your responsibility to get informed, read up on all the issues important to you. You can find the voting record for Obama here. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/o000167/key-votes/

Please note that on over 250 votes he did not vote. The reason being it was not politically good to do so. In other words, he did not want to take a stand on many issues. Thus, this could lead to more broken promises. If in fact he voted for a bill, then later criticized another about it, then it could be trouble.



This is another problem with our politicians, exspecailly if they are new. We do not have enough information to make a good decision.



There reasons we are lied to are simple, to get elected. So, with that in mind we as voters must make the best and safest choice as we possibly can. I suggest that every voter, get informed. Read and learn as much as possible, then ask yourself, is this person the best one for the job?



Would any hospital hire a doctor with no experience? Or a doctor who had only skipped his patients appointments? I think not, it almost sounds silly. We trust our Doctors because we have known them. We trust their judgement, based on the many times they have helped us or others in the past. Not on what they say, but what they have done.



So, I ask you, before you cast your next vote, remember those things. The person who will becomeCommander and Chief” holds all of America in their hands. Do you trust them?

Introduction To What Every Women Should Know

Due to the recent events in recent Political arena in the United States. I have compiled this instruction in regards to the History of Politics. This writing is set to be a guide and a tutorial, helping women better understand the political process. I am hopeful, that after reading this book, you will better understand the History and Differences of what is “pledged by the candidates” and the reality of what really happens, and why.

You also will learn how laws are created and how they can or cannot be changed. This will include all branches of the government, and how they work within the United States of America.
I am writing this in order to educate all voters, most importantly women. To help create a better understanding and to be able to tell the difference between the rhetoric and the truth.

Chapter 1

The History of the United States Government & How it Works

The Unites States government is made of of three parts.

1. Legislative (congress ) this is the house of Representatives & senate

2. Executive (president & vice president

3. Judicial (supreme Court)

The founding fathers of this nation, wanted to ensure that the power was distributed evenly. In other words, no one part of the government would have more power than the other. They wanted to ensure we would not have a government like Britain. This was on the minds of the writers of the Constitution. So, the called this the separation of powers.

Each part of the government had, and still does have different responsibilities. Yet, it was designed so they could work together for all government to run smoothly. This was done to assure that all citizens rights were and are protected. This was done by using a checks and balances system. In other words, one branch of government can check the powers of the others to ensure a balance of power.

Let’s begin by looking at the first branch of government and what it does.

The first branch of government we will examine is the legislative. This branch is The Senate and The House of Representatives. This branch passes our laws. It begins by a Congress person, drafting a bill. A bill is a document outlining a law that they want to get passed. The bill is then put on the “floor” of congress, all Senators have the right to speak for or against this bill. Then a vote is taken. If a majority vote to pass the bill, it then goes on to the House of Representatives. If it is not passed, (in other words) did not receive enough votes to reach a majority, then it is called a “no bill”. At this time the bill is “dead”. They only way that the law could be passed, is to have a Congress person start the process all over again.

If the bill, is passed (had a majority of the vote for it), then it goes to the House of Representatives and the process begins again. The bill is read and introduced, the Representatives, then can ague for or against it. A vote is taken, and the bill is not passed( it did not get the majority of the votes needed to pass). Then the bill is again a “No Bill” and considered dead. The same thing now applies in order to pass the law, they must send it back, and a Congressman must draft a new bill and start all over again.

If the bill is passed by BOTH the House and the Senate, then it is passed on to another branch of government. The Executive. You have to remember that there are alot of people who have to agree. This is why it is very hard to get laws passed. No one person has more authority than the other. Thus, checks and balances. There are 435 members of the house, and 100 members in the senate. So, they must get a majority of 535 different people.

A bill that has passed both the House and Senate, then goes to the Executive Branch of the government, the President. If he so chooses he may sign it and it will become law. If the president disagrees, he can choose to VETO it. By doing so, he is saying “no”, this will not become law.

The senate and house both have special jobs only they can do, such as:

Say yes or no to any treaties the president makes.
Say yes or no to any people the president recommends for jobs, such as cabinet officers, Supreme Court justices, and ambassadors.
Can hold a trial for a government official who does something very wrong.

The House of Representatives also have special jobs, only the can do, such as:

Start laws that make people pay taxes.
Decide if a government official should be put on trial before the Senate if s/he commits a crime against the country.

This is the way the laws have been passed since the beginning our of nation. This system is still in place today.

Then last branch, but not the least is the judicial. This is the supreme court, this courts main function is to “interpret the Constitution“. The number of Judges depends on Congress. The Constitution does not tell us how many are needed. In the beginning of our nation, there were 6. That number has now grown to 9, this was done in 1869. This number still stands today.

All judges are “appointed for life”. Only the president can nominate a judge. The president can nominate anyone he or she chooses, there are no qualifications to be a judge. Once a judge has been nominated, then the Senate must hold a hearing and ask questions of the potential judge. After lengthy hearings and many questions, they will vote. If they vote to “confirm” him, he has a new job as a supreme court justice. If they do not vote to confirm him, he’s out of luck, and unemployed.

In the past few years, there has been alot of opposition to many of the “nominee’s“. Many groups have sent lobbyist to persuade Senators to vote for or against a potential judge.

I will use Roe vs Wade as example. If for instance, President Bush Or John McCain would “nominate” a judge. If the judge was clearly Pro– Choice, then the Prochoice groups of this country would send the lobbyist to speak to the Senators, they would put pressure on the Senator’s, to “not confirm the judge”. This practice is relatively new to our country, beginning in 1925.

Once the committee reports out the nomination, the whole Senate considers it; a simple majority vote is required to confirm or to reject a nominee. Rejections are relatively uncommon; the Senate has explicitly rejected only twelve Supreme Court nominees in its history. The most recent rejection of a nominee by vote of the full Senate came in 1987, when the Senate refused to confirm Robert Bork.

However, this does leave the final decision with Congress, not the president. This is where the large amount of Congress people and lobbyist make a difference, remember they have to have a majority of the vote to win. Many presidents have tried to appoint justices that agree with there views, however this has not always worked out as they planed. Below is a example…

President Eisenhower expected him to be a conservative judge, but his decisions are arguably among the most liberal in the Court’s history. Eisenhower later called the appointment “the biggest damn fool mistake I ever made.”[8] Because the Constitution does not set forth any qualifications for service as a Justice, the President may nominate anyone to serve. However, that person must receive the confirmation of the Senate, meaning that a majority of that body must find that person to be a suitable candidate for a lifetime appointment on the nation’s highest court.

Remember that the justices are under no obligation to rule in favor or any party. They are only ruling on Constitutional Law.

There are only 2 ways a Justice can be “not confirmed“, that is by vote of Congress, or what is called a “fillabuster“. This has never been successfully used for a Justice, however it is a possibility, so I will explain.

A filibuster indefinitely prolongs the debate thereby preventing a final vote on the nominee. While senators may attempt to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee in an attempt to thwart confirmation, no nomination for Associate Justice has ever been filibustered.

So, the chances of that happening on very small. The most frequent way is for Congress to vote “not to confirm”, thus the president must look for someone more suitable for the job.

As far as what kind of cases the court hears, remember it has to deal with Consititutional issues. It is a appellate court. Which means any persons who want the court to hear A case, must submit a “petition”. Then the Court decides if they will even listen to augments. All cases must go through all the lower courts first, only then will the court consider a case.

Let me explain further, here are some examples. In Roe vs Wade, the pregnant women, (Roe) wished to challenge a Texas law outlawing abortion. Once Roe, had been through the lower Texas courts, the appeal finally went to the Supreme Court. This process can take years, it is not speedy. The Supreme court ruled that the Texas law violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution, thus the right to privacy as it pertains to due process. By doing so, the court overturned all the states laws against abortion.

When we all hear the term “overturn”, it simply means to reverse. The only way Roe vs Wade could be overturned, is if Roe or someone else challenged the lower courts, and made it all the way back to the supreme court. This has already been attempted by Roe.

The woman known as “Roe” in the landmark Supreme Court case that struck down all state laws restricting abortion is filing a motion in federal court today to overturn the 1973 decision.
The Roe v. Wade ruling should be set aside because of changes in law and new research that make the prior decision “no longer just,” argues Allan E. Parker, Jr., lead attorney for the San Antonio, Texas-based Justice Foundation.
Norma McCorvey
Parker is representing the former “Jane Roe,” Norma McCorvey, who has the right to petition for reopening the case because she was party to the original litigation.

This attempt has not worked so far, because many of the Pro – Choice groups came in and as opposition. Also, members of Congress could (although not very likely) introduce a bill to have Roe overturned. Remember this would have to pass by a majority of the vote. Then be signed by the president.

But just to make all this clear, if Roe vs Wade were ever to be reversed, then it will reverse the court decision. This would NOT out law abortion like alot of people think. All it would do is leave the decision up to each and every state in our union. Thus leaving the final decision up to each state. This would free up states to pass their own laws either for or against abortion.

This is the important part, NO PRESIDENT OR ONE PERSON CAN OVERTURN THIS LAW.

The president does not introduce laws, or overturn decisions. It takes alot of time and many people to overturn any decision. The only infulence that the president has is nominating theses judges. There is no gaurentee that the judge will be confirmed, and no gaurentee that he will rule in anyones favor. All justices must intereat the Consititution, no more, no less. Many Canidates have used this ploy with the voters, for examlpe. Ronald Reegan was elected, and it was hoped by the far right, that he could appiont judges to overturn Roe vs Wade. This is did not pan out. Conservatives have used this lie to sway votes, knowingly and diberatly misleading the uniformed public. thus, convicing women voters that thier Pro- Life belief will be overturned. The truth is more rhetoric than truth, we will examine this much more in Chapter 2.

So, knowing this, do not fear John McCain or any other candidate. They do not have as much authority as you think.


The plight handed to the average American women, over the last 232 years has been a long traveled road. But every few years, sexism raises its ugly head. It is then, that women have to stand up for what is right, and what is wrong. It seems the only time we can do this, is in time of crisis. The stolen nomination of Hillary Clinton, brings all this to the surface once again.

This time we need a different form of feminism, one that transforms us into action. This action must be taken to ensure a victory in the reformation of the DNC and voters rights. This will ensure (or at least attempt to stop voter fraud).

It is my belief that a large coalition of women, can achieve many things. This was never more apparent than in the very early days of the Victorian women’s movement.

Today, the core values have not changed. All we ask for is what is fair, and right, nothing more. We must all take a stand, and say ” We’ll remember in November“. As I think we will, the clear injustice of the DNC and the Media towards women, and Hillary was apparent.

Any real woman’s movement is dangerous. From the beginning it exposed the male power structure in all its hypocrisy. Its very existence and long duration were proof of massive large-scale inequality in a system that pretended to democracy.

This was a quote used during the time of the Civil War, for women’s rights. This statement seems to ring true today, just as it did then.

The only difference is that is was not just men, who stole this election. It came from a place deep inside our own party. This is a new kind of women’s movement, one not against men, but against the new democracy. This new DNC is not good for this country. It is controlled by some of the most corrupt figures in our society.

In order to fight this foe, we must stand up and let them all know…”We’ll remember in November”. In order to show this, I have made phone calls, sent emails and told Howard Dean, he will not see anyone contributions from me. But, in order for this to accomplish anything, Americans must show a strong support.

In other words, there must be a effect to show a effect. We must let as many know as we can that in November, we will not forget and fall in line.

And that “We’ll Remember in November”!!!!!

Today, it is with great sadness that I can say what Hillary was not able to. Pressure from the DNC and the Obama camp, surely lead to her words. These are the facts she was not allowed to say…….

The dnc has appointed a nominee, it was not a vote by all the people. As, a women the clear sexism, and race baiting by the DNC and the Obama campaign made it impossible for Hillary to continue. She was forced aside by the party we all have loved for so many years. This is believe will be a mistake, as when the 527’s and the RNC get done with Obama they will lose.

The words spoken by Senator Clinton, were not from the heart. This I believe, shows clearly for anyone to see. As women, we all know what is like to be “made to do something”, this is clearly what has happened.

Hillary could and did not say Obama, was the best choice. He is not what is best for America. Any research by informed voters, it becomes apparent that the change he speaks of, could only be a disaster….

His clear inexperience, racism and sexism make him a problem for the party itself. The working people, the women and the Hispanics have nothing to gain by a Obama candidacy. His heath care plan, will not include those who need it the most. Needless to say, his 20 year relationship with Islamic and Domestic terrorist clearly cannot help America. They are many skeletons in Obama’s closet, and they will surface before November.

Hillary cares about this country, Obama cares about Africa, and the rest of the world, but not us. Anyone who does not believe that, needs to dig a little deeper into his past and present.

Hillary couldn’t say don’t vote for Obama, however it was clear she did not believe the words she spoke. The expression on her face said it all, for anyone willing to watch. This is affirmative action at it’s worst. This candidate was hand picked, before the election even began, Howard Dean and the DNC made sure to be rid of the Clinton’s.

What Hillary could not say, was “I was backed into a corner, and pressured into this”. Consider yourself in her place, what else could see do?

The sheep is wolves clothing is trying to fool us, this blog is a call to all dem’s to stay the course. After hearing Senator Clinton’s speech, it is clear she was pressured into it. Senator Obama, not has begun to try to bring us together. This is not the case, we have been told that women, working class and the base of the party was not needed. Now He wants to play nice?

The truth is, our voices did not matter to Obama, and they still don’t.

“No self respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a party that ignores her” -Susan B Anthony, 1872

Please keep this in mind this week. The DNC has done just that and appointed a candidate, do not be fooled. I am asking all supporters of Senator Clinton, to stay home or vote for McCain. I understand this does not promote unity as Hillary asked. But the look on Hillarys face told it all. She said things she did not believe in, that much is clear.

For those who want to do as Hillary asked, PLEASE do some research on Obama before you vote. Do not blindly follow this man, to do so would be a injustice to this country.

It appears the General Election has begun. The new presumptive nominee now has his work cut out for him. The media has finally begun to look into Obama’s past. Today the Associated Press finally did a little of what they should have done months ago. For those of us who have done research on the candidates, this is old news. But for the first time reader, hold onto your seats! This election season will be a very rocky road.

Don’t say the Clinton supporters didn’t try to tell you, we did. But the supporters were to drunk with the kool-aid to listen. And for the undecided, well that’s the best part, finally it appears you will know more than you want to about Obama. The general public, was not warned or told about many things. The media choose to put on there cheer leading skirts and shake their pom-poms for Obama. They became so caught up in “he’s great”, they totally lost the concept of “the truth”.

The truth as reported in AP today, gives everyone a insight into the 527 ads, and RNC ads we all will see. And believe me, they will be good…..

Here are just a few of Obama’s friends..

Rezko is a Chicago businessman, convicted of more than a dozen charges this week. ANTOIN REZKO: “Tony” Rezko is a businessman who has helped raise campaign money for Obama and many other Illinois politicians. He was convicted Wednesday on 16 of 24 counts involving mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering and aiding and abetting bribery.Rezko and his family donated at least $21,457 to Obama and helped raise over $200,000 more, though not for his presidential bid. He also advised Obama on the purchase of a new Chicago home and, in his wife’s name, purchased a vacant lot next door to the new Obama home when the seller wanted to dispose of both properties at the same time. Rezko then sold a slice of the property to Obama.

Ayers is a professor — and former member of the radical Weather Underground.People who might complicate Obama’s campaign. WILLIAM AYERS: Today, Ayers is a university professor and a member of Chicago’s intellectual establishment. Forty years ago he was a member of the Weather Underground, a radical group that claimed responsibility for a series of bombings, including nonfatal explosions at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol.
Ayers was a fugitive for years with his wife, fellow radical Bernadine Dohrn. But after surrendering in 1980, the charges against Ayers were dropped because of prosecutorial misconduct.

EMIL JONES: Jones, the president of the Illinois Senate, amounts to Obama’s political godfather and was an important part of Obama’s longshot victory for U.S. Senate in 2004. He helped the little-known politician meet the right people, and he picked Obama to handle high-profile legislation during the two years leading up to the election.Jones is known for steering state money to a few favored institutions, including some that employ his relatives. Several of his relatives have gotten state jobs, and his wife’s government salary jumped 60 percent after he became Senate president. He has played an important role in blocking ethics legislation in Illinois.

RASHID KHALIDI: Khalidi is a scholar and author on Middle Eastern affairs who has criticized Israeli policies and was part of a Palestinian advisory panel to peace talks in the early 1990s.They met while both were teaching at the University of Chicago and living in the same neighborhood. Obama and his wife sometimes had dinner with Khalidi and his wife, Mona. The Khalidis hosted a political fundraiser for Obama in 2000, and the Woods Fund charity gave money to the Arab-American Action Network, run by Mona Khalidi, while Obama served on the charity’s board

JEREMIAH WRIGHT: Wright was Obama’s minister for 20 years. He helped Obama embrace Christianity, performed Obama’s marriage and baptized Obama and his two daughters.

MICHAEL PFLEGER: Pfleger, the white leader of a mostly black Catholic parish in Chicago, has been known as a firebrand for years. He protests everything from gun shops to Jerry Springer. Obama has referred to him as a spiritual adviser.Recently, he visited Obama’s church and preached a sermon in which he mocked Hillary Clinton and accused her of expecting to win the presidential nomination because she was white. Pfleger apologized, but Obama condemned the remarks and resigned from the church.

Now that the AP has reported all this I am sure there will be more. These kind of things show that Obama will be unelectable in November. Americans have been done a great injustice by our own media. The failure to mention any of this, has spun a protective web around Obama. But now that the general election has begun, it appears, finally the gloves have come off.

It is however, a little to late. This information should have been shared, by all media. But it was not, and may not for some time. Not all the media has picked up on the news in today’s AP. Msnbc, and Cnn show no signs of any of this news. They are still shielding the candidate. This will not be possible in the coming months, the swift ads, and RNC ads are already starting.

By November all these names will be common in the American household. Clinton supporters have been called racist, bitter and many other names to fowl to post. But that was not the case, you see, they did thier homework. But the real truth is, the media and the candidate have used a smoke screen to fool the voters. The charismatic smile, and large cheering crowds have deceived many. The long speeches that offer hope are more hype than real hope. All the while Karl Rove sits on Fox news and smiles… He knows what has happened, he also did his homework.

The DNC have what they want, now let them live with it. Let the games begin….



The War Within

There is a war withing the Democratic party, it is a war that most mainstream media refuses to believe exist I have heard many times from political analysis that this will go away. Many life long dem’s have been asked to get in line and follow Obama. All across the blogs, Obama supporters are attacking the Clinton supporters in hopes of getting them to “fall in line”. We have been called racist, stupid, hillbilly’s, and other names that are two offensive to mention.

The simple truth of the matter is, there has been a major defection from the democratic party. The reasons for the defection are many, the MI & Fl problem and the list of other problems with the candidate Obama have caused most of this.

The treatment of women, from the media and others has revived a new “suffrage movement”. This will be even more apparent, as the general election goes on. Many top officials state, that this defection will be temporary, I beg to differ. Many Clinton supporters would not even vote for Obama is Clinton is also on the ticket. This should be a sign to everyone that the divisions in the party are much deeper, than believed.

I for one, would not vote for Obama under any circumstances. And there are alot who agree with me. But is it enough to make a difference? I think it just might be. My reasoning for this belief is that if it will make no difference, then why are all the blogs getting attacked by Obama supporters, asking us to line up. If the dem’s truly do not need us, why are they out in full force?

It seems we Clinton supporters still need to be convinced that Obama is the savior of the country. So, in effect if we vote McCain we are disloyal to America. At least that’s the other side of the story. I am not disloyal, and most Clinton supporters who will not vote for Obama, have many reasons. None of them being about loyalty to the country.

In respect, we are more loyal than the average Obama supporter. We are Americans first and Democrats second. We will not blindly follow a leader, down any road. That kind of blindness can lead to destructive measures. This is a chance I do not wish to take. I will follow no leader blindly, because they have a (D) by their name.

There are still to many unanswered questions regarding Obama. I for one do not believe he could have went to Rev. Wrights church for 20 years, and not known what the man stood for. I also believe he has ties to rezco, and many other crooked politicians in Chicago. Not to even mention the fact, that Michelle thinks “America is mean”. Having her as first lady is a disgrace to this country. I cannot support anyone for president that hates America. Then there are the ties to the nation of Islam leader, along with the Palestinians. The list is so long, I do not have the space to go on.

The change issue is also one I dispute, Obama has failed to tell us how he will change this country. Hitler brought about change also, and look where that lead. Change is not always good, but to gamble on change without knowing what it may be, is like the blind leading the blind.

Many think by November we will change our mind, this is not a good gamble for Obama. Working class voters, women and many others have been deeply offended by this primary season. Most of these voters will not be back, you must remember that most of these voters are not ultra liberal. They represent the Conservative part of the Democratic party. John McCain leans more toward these voters than Obama.

The Rev. Wright scandal will also not go away, nor the statement that we cling to “guns & religion”. Since the Wright scandal, and the loss of Ohio, Obama has been slowing bleeding to death. The DNC refuses to see this, and blindly do not care. According to Obama, he will not court Hillary supporters. This leads us to believe he does not need us. Which gave John McCain a large opportunity, to hold out the olive branch.

Deserted and betrayed by our own party, most will gladly accept it. I know I did. It is still my hope, that on the floor of the convention, the DNC does the right thing. But, in the meantime, I will work and support John McCain. How many will join me?

Most of us have heard of the now “infamous” Michelle Obama tape. The question of the existence of this tape, is one that is talked about all over the blogs. The reality of the situation is does it really matter? After viewing the Rev. Wright and his friend, the kindly Priest, does it really matter? It is apparent to me, that if anyone sat in those pews for 20 years they have to know and share the same views. No one would sit there for 20 years and not agree.

To believe that Obama did not know about the views of the church is just as absurd as a Catholic saying they did not know the church believed in the virgin birth! However, after all the scandals, the DNC and the Obama followers, still refuse to believe the truth. They have hung the entire future of our country on a “hope”.

I have to admit today, that after the events of last night, I am truly afraid for our country. My fears are not unfounded. You see, if the MO tape exists, it does not matter. It is evident that Mrs. Obama shares the beliefs of Trinity Church. The idea of raising two very young girls in a envoirment that is filled with hate, is beyond belief. This also verifies the fact, that if a tape does or does not exists, makes no difference. You, as a American, must ask yourself, would you let your young children, listen to Rev. Wright? Or would you take your children to a KKK rally? You see, there is no difference, hates is hate, no matter what color your skin is.

So, knowing all that has been proven, how can anyone support Obama? The answer to this is very clear. There are alot of people, who refuse to believe the truth, in “hopes” of Obama saving them. But to look further into this we must look at the last few months. Since the Rev. Wright scandal began, Obama’s numbers have fallen. Hillary has continued to win in large numbers. Mr. Obama clearly has a problem with the “middle class vote”. This is a voter block he has lost, and is not likely to turn around.

So if a tape really does exist, what more harm could it do? It will not sway his supporters, and the DNC will not turn against him. Some think the tape would ruin his chances, I don’t think so. Let me explain myself, the supporters of Obama, and the media are so enthralled with the “idea” of a black candidate, that nothing else matters. Most of the mainstream media, have become so biased that it is apparent, that Obama is like Teflon don.

The Rev. Wright scandal would have ruined most politicians. Think about this, what if John McCain went to Hagee’s church for over twenty years? I believe he would not be the nominee if that was the case. The media, and the Obama supporters, have trampled all over Hillary to get to were they are. The leaders of the DNC will do anything to get Obama this nomination. This includes giving Obama delegates from a state where he name was not even on the ballet.

So, if they will go to such extremes, then this tape will mean nothing to them. After all that has been done to secure this nomination, how can the leaders of the party, admit they were wrong? I don’t believe they will. If the tape comes out, then the DNC and the Obama supporters will find some way to explain it. They will argue that, Michelle has “changed” and does not believe that anymore. So the release of this tape will not make them “see the light”. By now most people have formed a opinion, and this tape will change no ones mind.

As I write this, the speaker of the house is pressuring Hillary to end this race. She is also pressuring the super delegates to decide now. Why the rush? That’s apparent also, that the faster this can be done, the faster they can cover their tracks. Hopefully, sweeping all that has happened under the rug, so it can be forgotten.

I do not and cannot accept that all can be forgiven or forgotten so easily by the American people. A great injustice has been done, unlike any other in history. This injustice is enough to shake this country to the core. It infringes on our rights as Americans. The stolen votes, the backroom deals and the “making of a candidate” have driven us all to division. I fear this is a division that will not heal easily.

So, will the tape make any difference? I doubt it. The decision, has already and will be in November who to vote for? The popular vote is clear, and it is not Obama. Each scandal between now and the election, will only take a few more votes from the Obama campaign. There has been a significant drop off in support, in states like WV, KY and Ohio and PA. This will continue with each scandal that surrounds the senator. So, in the end, the damage has been done, even without a Michelle “whitey” tape.